Whose race, which race?

Do you really think, this type of caucasian american citizen keep his silence against a native american?

Why, in the same stadium, a bunch of supporters while they imitate the monkeys for Eto'o, they do not think of the black football players in their own team.

Could we define this by empathy or squirm out.

Or, we could not?

Social sciences, especially Psychology, are there to introduce, to not find out. It is there to classify it.

There will always be gatherings which are being fed by incapability of belonging sense, like racism, stalinism, kemalism, fascism, fundamentalism; where positivist sciences exist. The greatest enemy of these gatherings (and their goals) is the art, and poetry in top title.

If the Science, the Art and the Politics are brothers, something must have gone terribly wrong somewhere in their childhood. In final analysis, these three brothers were given by same resource, and they moved by same dynamics. The decomposition is the way how manage this. Thereat the Science reproduce the racism, the Politics utilise it, so the Art must break it down.

This is the true form of the Sensitivity-of-an-Artist rubbish. Public never know how but understand that their memory will be feinted and try to establish social subconsciousness. Bt does not mean that the art (the poetry) does not other ever. But the being other of the Art is about awareness of being opponent evermore.

Thus the edibility and drinkability of poetry is not harmful, but tradeablility is harmful.

For making poetry denominator out of being numerator...

"perhaps the avenues may inflamed if you kiss me
political science produce corpses in contemporary geographies
by then you may kill a mystic by beating
life is beautiful on an aspect my dear, so you are

-or else am I bothering you?"
-Ah Muhsin Ünlü-

16th of August, Sunday, 2009
The original article is on ustasına posta koyan jedi